Financial Access Commerce & Trade Service (U) Limited v Ndawula & Another (Civil Suit 901 of 2021)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court held that where defendants execute a deed of guarantee and indemnity for a third party's debt, and the third party defaults, the guarantors remain liable to pay the full debt on demand. The guarantor's obligation continues even after the creditor accepts the debtor's repudiation, transmuting into an obligation to compensate by way of damages. The court awarded the plaintiff the principal sum, discounted penalties, interest, general damages, and costs against the guarantors who failed to appear and defend the claim.
Outcome
Judgment entered for the Plaintiff; Defendants ordered to pay the claimed sum plus general damages, interest, and costs
Facts
The plaintiff lender advanced UGX 300,000,000 to Namirembe Offsprings Ltd under a credit facility agreement dated 13th March 2019. The two defendants executed a deed of guarantee and indemnity dated 14th March 2019, jointly and severally guaranteeing repayment of all monies, interests, costs, and charges due under the facility. The defendants also executed a deed of assignment of accounts receivable from three maize milling companies in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff disbursed the full loan amount in tranches on a revolving basis. Namirembe Offsprings Ltd defaulted on repayment despite multiple demand notices dated October and December 2020. In March 2021, the second defendant signed a payment plan committing to monthly payments of UGX 52,401,310, but the company failed to honour this obligation. The plaintiff terminated the facility and demanded full payment from the defendants as guarantors. The defendants were served with the suit but did not enter appearance. At the time of filing, the outstanding amount comprised principal of UGX 227,346,267, interest of UGX 36,109,189, and default interest of UGX 103,370,141. The plaintiff discounted penalties by 50%, claiming a total of UGX 315,140,527.
Issues
- Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the sum of UGX 315,140,527 from the Defendants under the deed of guarantee and indemnity dated 14th March 2019
- What remedies are available to the parties?
Orders
- Judgment entered for the Plaintiff against the Defendants.
- Defendants to pay the Plaintiff UGX 315,140,527.
- Defendants to pay general damages of UGX 10,000,000.
- Interest at 20% per annum on the principal sum from the date of judgment until payment in full.
- Interest at 10% per annum on general damages from the date of judgment until payment in full.
- Costs of the suit awarded to the Plaintiff.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Cases cited (6)
- Moschi v LEP Air Services Ltd [1972] 2 All ER 393
- Adonia Tumusiime and 318 Others v Bushenyi District Local Government and Another (HCCS No. 32 of 2012)
- James Fredick Nsubuga v Attorney General (HCCS No. 13 of 1993)
- Uganda Commercial Bank v Kigozi [2002] 1 EA 305
- Charles Acire v Myaana Engola (HCCS No. 143 of 1993)
- Kibimba Rice Ltd v Umar Salim (SC Civil Appeal No. 17 of 1992)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.