Wakilii

Finca (U) Ltd (MDI) v Uganda Revenue Authority (HCCS 220 of 2009)

High Court · [2011] UGCOMMC 89 · 2011 No Order as to Costs AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Ruling on costs following settlement of substantive suit challenging tax assessment
Decision
Suit settled by agreement; costs order made with each party bearing own costs

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The parties settled a tax assessment dispute after the defendant vacated UGX 81,343,505 of the disputed assessment, with UGX 219,000,000 having already been paid. The court ruled each party should bear its own costs, given the suit was settled and the original assessment could not be said to lack merit.

Outcome

Suit settled by agreement; costs order made with each party bearing own costs

Facts

The Uganda Revenue Authority assessed Finca (U) Ltd (MDI) to pay taxes totaling UGX 518,347,764. The plaintiff challenged the assessment as unlawful and filed suit. The plaintiff paid UGX 219,000,000 to the defendant during the course of proceedings. The parties subsequently reconciled the figures and agreed that the remaining assessment of UGX 81,343,505 in stamp duty should be vacated. The court entered judgment accordingly. The only remaining issue was the question of costs. The plaintiff's counsel failed to appear for the costs hearing despite prior notice. The court proceeded to determine costs in counsel's absence.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff or defendant should bear the costs of the suit following settlement on the substantive issue.

Orders

  • Each party shall bear its own costs of the suit.

Legislation cited (2)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Finca (U) Ltd (MDI) v Uganda Revenue Authority (HCCS 220 of 2009) [2011] UGCommC 89 (13 July 2011)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.