Formula Feeds Limited and Another v KCB Bank Uganda Limited (HCT-00-CC-CS 289 of 2014)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court held that non-citizens cannot acquire mailo land under the Constitution and Land Act, rendering the mortgage deed a nullity. The bank breached contract by failing to notify interest rate increases in writing as required. However, the plaintiffs failed to meet loan repayment obligations. Personal guarantees by directors remained enforceable, entitling the bank to recover the outstanding debt of UGX 4,272,740,118 plus interest at 21% per annum, but the mortgage could not be enforced as it was void ab initio.
Outcome
Plaintiffs' suit dismissed; defendant's counterclaim allowed in part with judgment for debt recovery
Facts
Formula Feeds Ltd, a company with Kenyan controlling shareholders, obtained credit facilities totalling UGX 4,531,000,000 from KCB Bank Uganda in 2011. The loan was secured by a mortgage over several properties registered as private mailo land. The plaintiffs alleged the bank breached the credit agreement by charging unauthorized interest, failing to notify interest rate increases, not opening letters of credit for equipment, and issuing a premature demand notice. The bank counterclaimed for outstanding debt after the plaintiffs defaulted on repayments. The plaintiffs admitted partial indebtedness of UGX 2.1 billion. A partial judgment on admission had been entered for UGX 2,159,000,000. The plaintiffs' business struggled, they requested extensions, and eventually stopped making payments in July 2013. The bank issued a demand notice in October 2013 for UGX 3,704,674,108.
Issues
- Whether the mortgages registered on the suit land are legal and enforceable?
- Who of the parties breached the contract?
- Whether the Debentures and Personal Guarantees are enforceable?
- Whether the Counter Claimant is entitled to recover from the Counter Defendants a sum of Ugx 3,704,674,108/=?
- What remedies are available to the parties?
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the defendant against the plaintiffs.
- Recovery of UGX 4,272,740,118/= ordered against the plaintiffs.
- Interest on the judgment sum at commercial rate of 21% per annum from date of judgment till payment in full.
- Costs of the suit awarded to the defendant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (8)
Cases cited (5)
- MacFoy v United Africa Co Ltd [1961] 3 WLR 1405
- JP Machira v Machira Waruru and Another [2007] eKLR
- Re Pritchard (deceased) [1963] 1 All ER 873
- Finnegan v Cementation Co Ltd [1953] 1 QB 688
- Industrial Investment Bank of India Ltd' v Biswanath Thiinjhnnwala [2009]
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.