Frontier Logistics International (U) Ltd and Another v Absa Bank (U) Limited (Miscellaneous Application No. 1755 of 2025 (Arising from Civil Suit No. 0119 of 2019))
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
An application for discovery of a valuation report was dismissed where the applicants failed to demonstrate the document was in the respondent's possession. The court held that contractual obligation to provide the valuation lay with the applicants under the facility letters, and the respondent's unchallenged assertion that it could not locate the document after search was accepted. While the document was found relevant and material to the defence of fraud, and not privileged, the applicants did not meet all three requirements for an order for discovery.
Outcome
Application for discovery dismissed
Facts
The respondent bank sued the applicants in Civil Suit No. 0119 of 2019 for recovery of debt arising from a loan disbursed to the 1st applicant and guaranteed by the 2nd applicant. The loan was secured against land at Kibuga Block 4 Plot 890. The applicants brought this application seeking an order that the respondent deliver a copy of the valuation report for the said land, asserting they needed it to prove fraud and undervaluation in the realization of the security. The respondent produced facility letters dated 27 July 2016 showing the contractual obligation to obtain and provide the valuation report lay with the 1st applicant. The respondent stated it had searched its records and could not locate the valuation report.
Issues
- Whether the Applicants have adduced sufficient grounds for orders sought?
- What remedies are available?
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs in the cause.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (8)
Cases cited (9)
- Kiyega George William v Rapid Advisory Services Ltd (Miscellaneous Application No. 2352 of 2025)
- Simbamanyo Estates Ltd and Another v Equity Bank (Miscellaneous Application No. 583 of 2022)
- Suleiman Kaweesi v Bank of Uganda and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 258 of 2022)
- Senkungu and 4 Others v Mukasa (Civil Appeal No. 17 of 2014)
- Jovelyn Barugahare v Attorney General (SCCA No. 28 of 1993)
- Kaweesi Suleiman and Others v Bank of Uganda and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 258 of 2022)
- Dresdner Bank A.G Vs Sango Bay Estates Ltd (No. 3) [1971] E.A 326 at 328
- Dresdner Bank A.G Vs Sango Bay Estates Ltd (No. 4) [1971] E.A 409
- Simbamanyo Estates Ltd and Another v Equity Bank (U) Limited and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 583 of 2022)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.