Gamukama and Another v Triple Mpungu General Trading Store Limited and Another (Civil Suit No. 17 of 2003)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the first defendant company was incorporated fraudulently by the second defendant to deprive the plaintiffs of property they had already purchased jointly with the second defendant. The purported second sale to the company was null and void because title had already passed to the three individual purchasers. Registration of the company as proprietor was obtained through fraud by presenting documents without the plaintiffs' knowledge or consent. The court cancelled the company's certificate of title and ordered registration in the names of the three original purchasers.
Outcome
Certificate of title cancelled; registration ordered in the names of the three original purchasers; damages and costs awarded to the plaintiffs
Facts
The plaintiffs and the second defendant were tenants of the Departed Asians Property Custodian Board in respect of plot 74 Mbarara High Street. In 1995 the Board advertised the property for sale and offered it to Triple Mpungu Traders at UGX 40,025,150. The plaintiffs paid UGX 36,226,350 and the second defendant paid UGX 10,650,000. A certificate of purchase was issued on 1st December 2000 in the names of the two plaintiffs and the second defendant as individuals, since Triple Mpungu Traders was a partnership that could not own property. The plaintiffs delegated the second defendant to process the joint title. The second defendant then incorporated the first defendant company in May 2001 and obtained a second certificate of purchase and subsequent certificate of title in the company's name without the plaintiffs' knowledge. The plaintiffs discovered the title was registered to the company and they were being excluded from ownership.
Issues
- Who was Triple Mpungu Traders that purchased the suit property?
- Whether the 1st defendant was registered as proprietor through fraud.
- What remedies are available to the parties?
Orders
- Declaration that plot 74 High Street, Mbarara belongs to Elly Amani Gamukama, Elizabeth Kyasiimire and Edward Kanoti.
- Declaration that the purported sale of the property to the 1st defendant was null and void.
- Order under section 177 of the Registration of Titles Act that the certificate of title issued to the 1st defendant and registered on 30th May 2002 be cancelled.
- The Registrar is directed to substitute the cancelled certificate by making entries in the register indicating the proprietors as Elly Amani Gamukama, Elizabeth Kyasiimire and Edward Kanoti.
- Damages of UGX 30,000,000 awarded to the plaintiffs.
- Interest on damages at court rate from the date of judgment until payment in full.
- Costs of the suit to the plaintiffs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
Cases cited (3)
- Katarikawe v Katwiremu and Another (1977) HCB 187
- Kampala Bottlers v Damanico (U) Ltd (Supreme Court Appeal No. 22 of 1992)
- Matovu and 2 Others v Sseviri and Another (1979) 174
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.