Gartrude Namakula and Others v Festo Lukwago and Others (CIVIL SUIT NO. 298 OF 2022)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court dismissed the suit for want of prosecution under Order 17 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules and section 17(2) of the Judicature Act where no action had been taken by either party to proceed with the case since 9 August 2023.
Outcome
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution
Facts
The plaintiffs, as administrators of the estate of the Late Kalubi Erinest, brought a civil suit in the Land Division against the defendants, who included administrators of the estate of the Late Adam Mugalasi, other individuals, a law firm, and the Commissioner Land Registration. No action was taken by either party to proceed with the case after 9 August 2023.
Orders
- Suit dismissed for want of prosecution under O.17 r.6 of the CPR and s.17(2) of the Judicature Act.
Legislation cited (2)
- Civil Procedure Rules O.17 r.6
- Judicature Act s.17(2)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.