Wakilii

Gideon Mwesigye and Others v Namara Edith (Civil Miscellaneous Application 338 of 2024)

High Court · [2025] UGHC 461 · 2025 Application Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for judgment on admission arising from failure to file reply to counterclaim in Civil Suit No. 69 of 2024
Decision
Application for judgment on admission dismissed

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The court held that failure to file a reply to a counterclaim does not entitle the counterclaimant to judgment on admission under Order 13 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Order 8 Rule 18(5) places a party who fails to file a reply to a counterclaim in the same position as a party who fails to file a defence, and the appropriate remedy depends on the nature of the claim. The application was dismissed.

Outcome

Application for judgment on admission dismissed

Facts

The Applicants filed a counterclaim in Civil Suit No. 69 of 2024 on 2 July 2024 and served it on the Respondent's advocates. The Applicants contended that the Respondent failed to file a reply to the counterclaim within the statutory period of 15 days prescribed by Order 8 Rule 11(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The Respondent's advocate only served the reply on 6 September 2024, which was 42 days after the counterclaim was filed. The Applicants sought judgment on admission under Order 8 Rule 18(5) and Order 13 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, arguing that the Respondent's failure to reply within time deemed the facts in the counterclaim admitted. The Respondent argued that a reply had been filed on 9 July 2024 and endorsed by the Deputy Registrar on 16 July 2024, and that no admission had been made.

Issues

  1. Whether the Applicants are entitled to judgment on admission against the Respondent for failure to file a reply to the counterclaim within the statutory period.
  2. Whether Order 8 Rule 18(5) of the Civil Procedure Rules entitles a counterclaimant to apply for judgment on admission under Order 13 Rule 6 when no reply to counterclaim is filed.

Orders

  • Application dismissed.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Judgment on Admission — Order 13 Rule 6 — Requirements
For a court to grant judgment on admission under Order 13 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, there must be a clear and unequivocal acceptance by one party of the case or part of the case of the other party.
Civil Procedure — Counterclaim — Failure to File Reply — Effect of Order 8 Rule 18(5)
Order 8 Rule 18(5) of the Civil Procedure Rules places a party that has not filed a reply to a counterclaim in the same position as a party that has not filed a defence to a suit, and the nature of the counterclaim dictates the appropriate procedural steps to be taken by the counterclaimant.
Civil Procedure — Judgment on Admission — Failure to File Defence — Inapplicability of Order 13 Rule 6
Failure to file a defence to a suit does not entitle the opposite party to file an application for judgment on admission under Order 13 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, because failure to file a defence does not constitute an admission of facts.

Legislation cited (9)

Cases cited (1)

  • Eric Ntungura v Jane Mwesigwa (High Court Civil Suit No. 71 of 2005)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Gideon Mwesigye and Others v Namara Edith (Civil Miscellaneous Application 338 of 2024) [2025] UGHC 461 (30 June 2025)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.