Global Technical Services & Anor v KEC International Ltd (CAD ARB 29 of 2016)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The tribunal granted the application for appointment of an arbitrator despite a dispute over whether the applicant was correctly cited as a limited company. Applying Article 126(2)(e) of the Constitution, the tribunal held that substantive justice should be administered without undue regard to technicalities. Both counsel were found to have failed in their duty to clarify the factual basis of the company's legal status. Costs were awarded to the respondent due to the applicant's failure to address the technical error promptly.
Outcome
Arbitrator to be appointed; matter to proceed to arbitration
Facts
On 25 March 2016, a sub-contract agreement was concluded between KEC International Ltd (respondent) and Global Technical Services & General Agencies (applicant). A dispute arose between the parties concerning the formulation of the arbitral tribunal. The application papers prepared by the applicant's counsel cited the applicant as a limited company by adding 'Ltd' to its name, though this designation did not appear in the sub-contract agreement itself. The respondent objected to this designation, arguing the applicant was not a limited company. Neither counsel provided evidence from the Uganda Registration Services Bureau to clarify the applicant's actual legal status. The existence of the underlying sub-contract was not disputed.
Issues
- Whether the tribunal should appoint an arbitrator despite a dispute over the correct legal status of the applicant company.
- Whether a technical error in the citation of the applicant's name should prevent the substantive resolution of the dispute.
Orders
- Application for appointment of arbitrator granted.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Constitution of Uganda Article 126(2)(e)
- Advocates (Professional Conduct) Regulations S.I. No.267-2 Regulation 17
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.