Gold Star Insurance Company Ltd v Ssemwemba Ronald and Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 872 of 2020)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court granted the application for stay of execution pending appeal, finding that the applicant had satisfied the three conditions under Order 43 Rule 4(3) of the Civil Procedure Rules: substantial loss would result from execution of a decree for UGX 100,000,000 plus costs; the application was filed without unreasonable delay following judgment; and the applicant demonstrated ability to deposit security for costs. The court ordered the applicant to deposit UGX 100,000,000 as security within 14 days.
Outcome
Stay of execution granted pending appeal, conditional upon deposit of security within 14 days
Facts
The first respondent, Ssemwemba Ronald, instituted Civil Suit No. 25 of 2016 in which the applicant, Gold Star Insurance Company Ltd, was joined as a third party. On 17 August 2020, the trial court found the applicant liable as third party and ordered it to pay UGX 100,000,000 as indemnity. On 28 August 2020, the applicant filed a notice of appeal. On 6 November 2020, the applicant filed this application seeking stay of execution of the decree pending determination of the appeal. The applicant contended that it was not liable to indemnify the second defendant because the insurance policy was a contractor's plant and machinery policy, not a comprehensive policy, and that the insured had defaulted on premium payments by the time of the accident. An interim stay was granted on 8 December 2020. The bill of costs had been taxed and allowed at UGX 12,974,100.
Issues
- Whether there is an arguable appeal.
- Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory if the application for stay is not granted.
Orders
- Application for stay of execution pending appeal granted.
- Applicant to deposit UGX 100,000,000 as security for costs within 14 days from the date of the ruling.
- Costs of this application to stay in the cause.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
Cases cited (9)
- Nalwoga Gladys v EDCL Limited and George Ragui Kamoni (Miscellaneous Application No. 07 of 2013)
- Lawrence Musiitwa Kyazze v Eunice Busingye (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 18 of 1990)
- Tropical Commodities Suppliers Ltd and 2 Others v International Credit Bank Ltd (in liquidation) (Miscellaneous Application No. 379 of 2003)
- John Baptist Kawanga v Namyalo Kevina and Ssemakula Laurence (Miscellaneous Application No. 12 of 2017)
- Kampala Bottlers v Uganda Bottlers [1991] HLR 22
- Ujagar Singh v Runda Coffee Estates Ltd [1966] EACA 266
- Attorney General of the Republic of Uganda v East African Law Society and Secretary General of the East African Community (EACJ Application No. 1 of 2013)
- Andrew Kisawui v Dan Oundo Malingu (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 467 of 2013)
- Tropical Commodities Suppliers Ltd and Ors v International Credit Bank Ltd (In Liquidation) (2004) 2 EA 331
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.