Gondariya v Imperial Gas Supply (U) Limited (Miscellaneous Application 1179 of 2021)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Court granted leave to amend plaint to reflect part payment of debt. Amendment sought to reduce claimed amount from UGX 220,000,000 to UGX 194,400,000. Court held amendment should be freely allowed before hearing where it causes no injustice to opposite party and enables determination of real controversy. Amendment did not prejudice respondent's defence and actually reduced potential liability.
Outcome
Leave to amend plaint granted with directions for filing and service within 14 days
Facts
The Applicant filed Civil Suit No. 416 of 2020 by summary procedure seeking to recover loan arrears of UGX 220,000,000 from the Respondent. The loan was advanced on 7 February 2018 and was repayable by 30 June 2018. The Respondent issued postdated cheques which were dishonoured. The Respondent successfully obtained leave to defend. After filing the suit, the Respondent made part payment of UGX 25,600,000, reducing the outstanding balance to UGX 194,400,000. The Applicant sought leave to amend the plaint to reflect the updated amount. The Respondent opposed, arguing the amendment would prejudice its defence. Neither party appeared at the hearing.
Issues
- Whether the applicant should be granted leave to amend his plaint.
Orders
- The Applicant is granted leave to amend his plaint in order to update the amount claimed as the outstanding loan balance.
- The Applicant shall file the amended plaint in Court and serve the same on the Respondent within 14 (fourteen) days from the date of this ruling.
- Costs of this application shall abide by the outcome of the main suit.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
Cases cited (1)
- Mulowooza Brothers Ltd v N. Shah & Co. Ltd (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 26 of 2010)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.