Gustro v Uganda Revenue Authority (Application No TAT 17 of 2017)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Tribunal held that books suitable for use only in public libraries and educational establishments attract zero-rate VAT when supplied, regardless of whether they are sold to public libraries, educational institutions, or individual members of the public. The Tribunal further held that books imported under the Florence Agreement are exempt from VAT at importation. The assessment of UGX 55,530,070 was set aside. The Tribunal interpreted 'suitable for use only' to exclude only offensive materials, not books with dual educational and leisure purposes.
Outcome
Application allowed; VAT assessment set aside
Facts
Gustro Limited imports and supplies books to educational institutions. Uganda Revenue Authority conducted a post-clearance audit for the period January 2011 to June 2016 and assessed VAT of UGX 55,530,070, alleging that the applicant imported books that were not exclusively educational materials. URA classified some books as novels, leisure reading books, self-help books, and children's books, concluding they did not fall within the definition of educational materials under the VAT Act and the Florence Agreement. The applicant objected, arguing that the books were educational materials exempt from VAT under the East African Community Customs Management Act and zero-rated under the VAT Act. The applicant testified that it sells only to educational institutions and relies on circulars from the National Curriculum Development Centre. URA's witness admitted he had not read the books and applied a dual-purpose test to exclude them from exemption.
Issues
- Whether the supply of the disputed books and other materials is zero-rated or exempt under the VAT law.
- What remedies are available to the applicant.
Orders
- Application allowed with costs.
- The respondent's assessment of VAT of UGX 55,530,070 is set aside.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (13)
- Value Added Tax Act s.4
- Value Added Tax Act s.19(1)
- Value Added Tax Act s.20
- Value Added Tax Act s.24(4)
- Value Added Tax Act Second Schedule paragraph 1(g)
- Value Added Tax Act Second Schedule paragraph 2(a)
- Value Added Tax Act Third Schedule paragraph 1(d)
- Value Added Tax Act Third Schedule paragraph 4(a)
- East African Community Customs Management Act 2004 s.2
- East African Community Customs Management Act 2004 s.114(2)
- East African Community Customs Management Act 2004 Fifth Schedule Part B item 17
- Education (Pre-Primary, Primary and Post-Primary) Act 2008 No. 13
- National Curriculum Development Centre Act
Cases cited (1)
- Cape Brandy Syndicate v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1921] KB 64
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.