Guzime v Byaruhanga and Another (Miscellaneous Application 1 of 2023)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court granted the applicant leave to amend his plaint to add a prayer for distribution and division of the deceased's estate. The amendment did not substitute the cause of action but merely added a relief relating to the same facts. No prejudice was caused to the respondents, who were also estate beneficiaries.
Outcome
Applicant granted leave to amend plaint to include prayer for distribution and division of the estate of the late Bagenda Yolamu Wandera
Facts
The applicant filed Civil Suit No. 51 of 2022 against the respondents for trespass to land at Nyangahya Division, Masindi District. The applicant's claim was that he occupied a plot gifted to him by his late father, Bagenda Yolamu Wandera, and that after the father's death, the respondents trespassed on the suit land. The applicant later sought to amend the plaint to add a prayer for distribution and division of the late father's estate, stating that the estate had never been legally distributed and the respondents occupied approximately three quarters of it. The respondents opposed the amendment, alleging it substituted the cause of action.
Issues
- Whether the applicant should be granted unconditional leave to amend his plaint in Civil Suit No. 51 of 2022.
Orders
- Application allowed.
- Applicant granted leave to amend plaint in Civil Suit No. 51 of 2022.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Judicature Act s.33
- Civil Procedure Rules O.6 r.19
Cases cited (7)
- Gaso Transport Services Ltd v Martin Adala Obene (SCCA No. 4 of 1994)
- Lubowa Gyaviira and Others v Makerere University (HCMA No. 47 of 2009)
- Eastern Bakery v Castelino (1959) EA 461
- Namugenyi Margret Ntabaazi and Another v Nambi Stellah and 4 Others (HCMA No. 486 of 2016)
- Major General David Tinyefuza v Attorney General (Constitutional Appeal No. 1 of 1997)
- Tororo Cement Co Ltd v Frokina International Ltd (Civil Appeal No. 2 of 2001) [2002] UGSC 24
- Auto Garage Vs Motokov
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.