Hajat Aisha Nakazibwe v Muhamed Nabwaaga (HCT-00-LD- CS-0188 of 2009) (HCT-00-LD- CS-0188 of 2009)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
By consent of both parties and their lawyers, the High Court entered judgment requiring the defendant to surrender suit property at Nganjo Busiro comprising Block 400 and all title documents to the plaintiff, in exchange for the plaintiff relinquishing interests in other jointly acquired properties and withdrawing criminal complaints against the defendant.
Outcome
Suit property awarded to plaintiff by consent; plaintiff relinquished interests in other properties and agreed to withdraw criminal complaints
Facts
The parties, who had divorced, disputed ownership of property comprised in Block 400 at Nganjo Busiro, Lutembe Beach Road. Multiple sale agreements relating to the property had been executed on various dates in 2004 and 2005. The parties had also acquired other properties prior to their divorce. The plaintiff had lodged criminal charges or complaints against the defendant.
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff by consent.
- The defendant shall surrender to the plaintiff the suit property comprised in Block 400, at Nganjo Busiro, Lutembe Beach Road with all developments thereon.
- The defendant shall surrender all documents of title, namely the sale agreements dated 9th November 2004, 20th November 2004, 3rd December 2004, and 4th March 2005.
- The plaintiff shall totally relinquish all her interests in any other properties that the parties had acquired prior to their divorce.
- Whatever criminal charges/complaints against the defendant by the plaintiff be withdrawn from wherever they have been lodged, unconditionally.
- Each party shall bear its own costs.
- The defendant shall introduce the plaintiff to the local authorities of the area as the new owner of the suit property and to the former mailo-land owner of the suit land in the presence of their respective lawyers.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.