Hajji Tuma Goobi and Another v Musisi Ali and Others (Miscellaneous Application 107 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Application dismissed for want of prosecution. Neither party appeared when the matter was called for hearing on 24 September 2025. The application had been filed in February 2021 and had not been prosecuted for over two years. Court applied Order 9 rule 17 and Order 17 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules to dismiss the application.
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of parties and failure to prosecute for over two years
Facts
The applicants filed an application on 24 February 2021 seeking orders that the suit filed by the respondents in Civil Suit No. 1100 of 2019 be dismissed as frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of court process. When the application was called for hearing on 24 September 2025, neither party appeared in court. The application had not been prosecuted for over two years since filing.
Issues
- Whether the application should be dismissed where neither party appears at the hearing.
- Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution having not been prosecuted for over two years.
Orders
- Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.