Wakilii

Hajji Zubid Kasim Walugembe v Nandawula Sharon [2026] UGHCLD 5

High Court · 2026 Application Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Interlocutory application by notice of motion in a pending civil suit seeking dismissal of the respondent's counterclaim for want of locus standi and failure to disclose a cause of action
Decision
Application dismissed as premature; the counterclaim stands and the main suit proceeds to trial

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The court dismissed an interlocutory application to strike out a counterclaim on grounds of want of locus standi and no cause of action. Having himself sued the respondent in the main suit, the applicant could not deny her standing to defend and counterclaim; a party sued has standing before the court. The respondent's assertion of a beneficial interest in the suit land as a daughter of the deceased registered proprietor amounted to a valid cause of action requiring investigation at trial. Questions of the merits of the defence and counterclaim were matters for trial, and the grounds raised could be framed as issues in the main suit. The application was premature.

Outcome

Application dismissed as premature; the counterclaim stands and the main suit proceeds to trial

Facts

The applicant filed Civil Suit No. 439 of 2025 against the respondent and two others alleging breach of a purchase agreement for land comprised in Kyadondo Block 181 Plot 4274 at Kiwologoma. The respondent filed a written statement of defence together with a counterclaim seeking, among other things, a declaration that the applicant's registration on the suit land was illegal and fraudulent and an order directing the Registrar of Titles to cancel the fraudulent entries on the certificate of title. The respondent asserted that she is a biological daughter of the late Edmond Luyomba Kizza, the original registered proprietor of the suit land, and a beneficiary of his estate. She contended that although the land had initially been sold by the administrator of her late father's estate to the persons from whom the applicant derived his interest, the transfers were effected fraudulently and without the consent of the beneficiaries, and that the applicant had not carried out adequate due diligence. The applicant then applied to have the counterclaim dismissed for want of locus standi and for disclosing no cause of action.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent, as a beneficiary of an intestate estate without letters of administration, had locus standi to file a counterclaim in respect of the suit land.
  2. Whether the counterclaim in Civil Suit No. 439 of 2025 disclosed a cause of action against the applicant and should be dismissed at an interlocutory stage.

Orders

  • Application is dismissed.
  • Each party to bear their own costs.
  • Parties advised to focus on the main suit fixed for hearing on 20th April 2026 at 10.00am.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Locus Standi — Standing of a Party Sued to Defend and Counterclaim
A party who has been sued has locus standi before the court, and the plaintiff who brought that party before the court cannot thereafter challenge her standing to defend and to raise a counterclaim.
Succession & Estates — Beneficiary of Intestate Estate — Standing to Sue Without Letters of Administration
A person claiming a beneficial interest in land forming part of an intestate estate may assert that interest in proceedings, and such a claim constitutes a valid cause of action warranting investigation at trial.
Civil Procedure — Counterclaims — Striking Out at Interlocutory Stage
A defendant is at liberty to raise any counterclaim for the court's consideration provided it discloses a cause of action, and the merits of the defence and counterclaim are matters for determination at trial rather than by interlocutory application.
Land & Property — Allegations of Fraudulent Transfer and Registration — Triable Issues
Allegations that a registered proprietor's title was obtained through fraudulent transfer without the consent of estate beneficiaries raise triable issues that must be resolved after evidence at trial, not on an interlocutory application to dismiss.

Legislation cited (3)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Hajji Zubid Kasim Walugembe v Nandawula Sharon [2026] UGHCLD 5 (21 January 2026)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.