Wakilii

Hard Rock Quarry (U) Limited v Commissioner Land Registration and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 211 of 2020)

High Court · [2021] UGHC 81 · 2021 Application Granted AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for review of High Court order arising from Civil Appeal No. 115 of 2015, to correct land description after respondents allegedly changed title particulars
Decision
Application for review granted; court's earlier order reviewed to incorporate correct land description; Commissioner ordered to reinstate applicant as registered proprietor under the corrected land particulars

Observed later treatment

Cited — treatment unverified cited in 4 (treatment unverified) Sequitur — Uganda’s citator · Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

No adverse treatment recorded Cited 4 times with no adverse treatment recorded; not yet tested on the merits. Citations rising — 5 citing cases on record, 5 in the most recent three data years. Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — a deterministic signal, not legal advice.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The High Court granted the application for review, finding that the change in land title description after the court's original order constituted new and important matter justifying review. The court held that the Commissioner's alteration of the certificate of title particulars from LRV/JJ0346 Volume JJA74 Folio 7 to LRV JJA 414 Folio 22 (referring to the same land) after the court had ordered reinstatement of the applicant deprived the applicant of the fruits of the decree. The court reviewed its earlier order to clarify that both land descriptions refer to the same property and ordered the Commissioner to reinstate the applicant as registered proprietor under the new description.

Outcome

Application for review granted; court's earlier order reviewed to incorporate correct land description; Commissioner ordered to reinstate applicant as registered proprietor under the corrected land particulars

Facts

The applicant Hard Rock Quarry (U) Limited had been successful in Civil Appeal No. 115 of 2015, obtaining an order on 17 June 2020 setting aside the Commissioner Land Registration's decision and directing reinstatement as registered proprietor of land described as LRV/JJ0346 Volume JJA74 Folio 7 Plot 68-72 Jinja Municipality. After the court's order, on 21 July 2020, the Commissioner registered the 2nd respondent Steel Rolling Mills Limited as proprietor of land with the description LRV JJA 414 Folio 22, Plot 68-72, Industrial Estate Road, Masese II, Jinja Municipality. The applicant contended this was the same land and the change in description was made to defeat the court's order. The applicant brought this review application to correct the land description in the original order. The respondents did not contest the application.

Issues

  1. Whether the court should review its order in Civil Appeal No. 115 of 2015 to correct the description of the suit land after the respondents changed the land title particulars.
  2. Whether the applicant satisfied the requirements for review under Order 46 Rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules by demonstrating new and important matter or evidence not available at the time of the original order.

Orders

  • The first and third orders in Civil Appeal No. 115 of 2015 dated 17 June 2020 are maintained.
  • The land comprised in LRV JJ/0346 Volume JJA74 Folio 7 Plot 68-72 Jinja Municipality, Block Industrial Estate is the same land now known as LRV JJA 414 Folio 22 Plot 68-72, Industrial Estate Road, Masese II, Jinja Municipality.
  • The Commissioner Land Registration is ordered to reinstate the applicant as the registered proprietor of land now comprised in LRV JJA 414 Folio 22 Plot 68-72, Industrial Estate Road, Jinja Municipality, Masese II, Jinja.
  • The applicant shall have the costs of this application.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Review of Judgment — Requirements — New and Important Matter
For an application for review to succeed under Order 46 Rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the applicant must show that after the order was passed, they came into knowledge of new and important matter or evidence which was not available to them before the order was made, or could not reasonably have been obtained during that time, or that there has been some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record.
Civil Procedure — Review of Judgment — Post-Order Actions as New Matter
Where a land registration authority changes the description of land and registers it in another party's name after a court has ordered reinstatement of an applicant as registered proprietor, such change constitutes new and important matter justifying review of the court's order, as the applicant would have had no knowledge of the new description at the time of the original order.
Civil Procedure — Review of Judgment — Deprivation of Fruits of Decree
A party has suffered a legal grievance justifying review where administrative actions taken after a court order have the effect of making the order moot and rendering useless the remedy that the party had achieved, thereby depriving them of the fruits of the decree.
Civil Procedure — Uncontested Applications — Evidential Burden
Where no affidavit in reply is filed to contest an application, the assumption is that the evidence supporting the application is true, but the onus nonetheless remains on the applicant to prove their claim.

Legislation cited (5)

Cases cited (3)

  • Ladak Abdallah Mohammed Hussein v Isingoma Kakiiza (Supreme Court Criminal Appeal No. 8 of 1995)
  • Re Nakivubo Chemists(U) Ltd (1979) HCB 12
  • Energo Projekt Niskogrndja Joint Stock Co. v Br. Kasirye Gwanga and Another (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 558 of 2009)

Cases citing this judgment (4)

How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Hard Rock Quarry (U) Limited v Commissioner Land Registration and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 211 of 2020) [2021] UGHC 81 (18 May 2021)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.