Haruna v Attorney General & Another (Constitutional Petition 18 of 2020)
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 1 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
A constitutional question already interpreted and adjudicated by the Constitutional Court is res judicata; the petition challenging regulation 13 of the Mortgage Regulations was accordingly dismissed.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Haruna applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.