Hass Petroleum (U) Limited v Kena International Limited and Another (Civil Suit No. 275 of 2021)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for UGX 356,796,800 allegedly spent over the contractual sum, finding the plaintiff failed to prove payment of the full contractual sum of UGX 6,216,686,604 or that the defendant failed to execute its obligations. The court allowed the counterclaim in part, awarding the defendant UGX 50,000,000 in general damages for failure to pay balances on construction contracts, finding the reconciliation statement signed by the defendant's site engineer binding on both parties under the doctrine of ostensible authority.
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed. Counterclaimant awarded UGX 50,000,000 in general damages with interest at 6% per annum from judgment until payment in full.
Facts
On 6 June 2018, Hass Petroleum (plaintiff) contracted with Kena International (1st defendant) for construction of four petrol stations at Jinja, Lira, Buloba, and Gulu for UGX 5,984,707,289, with completion by January 2019. The plaintiff advanced UGX 4,043,109,265 and the parties agreed to variations totaling UGX 231,979,325, bringing the total contractual sum to UGX 6,216,686,604. Due to delays and the 1st defendant's financial difficulties, the parties entered a second agreement on 17 June 2019 whereby the plaintiff would complete the works directly, with Fagayo-Fagayo (2nd defendant) as guarantor. The plaintiff claimed it spent UGX 600,925,157 over the contractual sum, offset UGX 244,128,357 owed for Buloba, and sought the balance of UGX 356,796,800. The defendants denied the claim and counterclaimed for unpaid balances on the contracts including UGX 231,979,325 for extra works. The Gulu site was never completed due to resistance from residents claiming to be lawful tenants.
Issues
- Whether there was breach of contracts for the construction of the Plaintiff's fuel stations, and if so, by whom?
- What remedies are available to the parties?
Orders
- Plaintiff's suit dismissed against the Defendants with costs.
- Judgment entered for the Counterclaimant against the Counter-Defendant.
- General damages of UGX 50,000,000 awarded to the Counterclaimant.
- Interest on general damages at 6% per annum from date of judgment until payment in full.
- Costs of the suit and half the costs of the counterclaim awarded to the Counterclaimant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
Cases cited (23)
- Senkungu & 4 Ors v Mukasa (Civil Appeal No. 17 of 2014)
- Jovelyn Barugahare v Attorney General (SCCA No. 28 of 1993)
- Behange v School Outfitters (U) Ltd [2000] 1 EA 20
- Barclays Bank of Uganda Limited v Bakojja (Civil Suit No. 53 of 2011)
- Nakawa Trading Co. Ltd v Coffee Marketing Board (HCCS No. 137 of 1991)
- Green Boat Entertainment Ltd v City Council of Kampala (Civil Suit No. 580 of 2003)
- United Building Services Ltd v Yates Muskrat T/A Quickset Builders & Co. (HCCS No. 154 of 2005)
- Kasozi v DFCU Bank Ltd (HCCS No. 1326 of 2000)
- Interfreight Forwarders (U) Limited v East African Development Bank (Civil Appeal No. 33 of 1992)
- MHK Engineering Services (U) Ltd v MacDowell Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 825 of 2018)
- Friecca Pharmacy Limited v Anthony Natiff (Miscellaneous Application No. 498 of 2019)
- Golf View Inn (U) Ltd v Barclays Bank (U) Ltd (Civil Suit No. 358 of 2009)
- Verschures Creameries Limited v Hull and Netherlands Steamship Co. Ltd [1921] KB 608
- Kyambadde v Mpigi District Administration [1983] HCB 44
- Bonham-Carter v Hyde Park Hotel [1948] 64 TLR 177
- Storms v Hutchinson [1905] AC 515
- Robert Cuossens v Attorney General (Civil Appeal No. 8 of 1999)
- Crown Beverages Ltd v Sendu Edwards (Civil Appeal No. 1 of 2005)
- Uganda Commercial Bank v Kigozi [2002] 1 EA 305
- Crescent Transportation Co Ltd v Bin Technical Services Ltd (CACA No. 25 of 2000)
- Premchandra Shenoi & Anor v Maximov Oleg Petrovich (Civil Appeal No. 9 of 2003)
- Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd (No. 2) [1970] EA 469
- Ushillani v Kampala Pharmaceuticals Ltd (Civil Appeal No. 6 of 1998)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.