Hebron Evangelical Pentecostal Ministries v The National Bureau for NGO (MISCELLANEOUS CAUSE NO. 108 OF 2018)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the respondent's decision to recall and cancel the applicant's NGO certificate was lawful and did not violate principles of natural justice. The applicant's certificate of incorporation had been cancelled by the Uganda Registration Services Bureau, depriving it of legal status required for NGO registration. The respondent issued a notice requiring the applicant to show cause why the certificate should not be cancelled, but the applicant failed to respond. When an opportunity to be heard is offered and the party does not respond, the decision maker may proceed. Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed; respondent's decision to recall and cancel the applicant's certificate and NGO permit upheld
Facts
The applicant, an NGO, sought judicial review of the respondent National Bureau for NGO's decision to recall and cancel its certificate of registration and NGO permit. On 14 March 2018, the Uganda Registration Services Bureau (URSB) recalled the applicant's certificate of incorporation due to internal disputes between the applicant's directors. On 4 May 2018, the respondent wrote to the applicant's directors recalling the certificate and permit under section 29(4)(a) of the NGO Act 2016, requiring the applicant to show cause why the certificate should not be cancelled and to deposit it by 11 May 2018. One of the applicant's own directors, Pr. Bizimungu Emmanuel, petitioned the NGO Board seeking cancellation of the certificate. The applicant neither responded to the show cause notice nor deposited the certificate and permit. The applicant then brought this judicial review application alleging breach of natural justice and procedural impropriety.
Issues
- Whether the impugned decision of the respondent was irrational, illegal and ultra vires.
- Whether the decision was procedurally improper and violated the principles of natural justice.
- What remedies are available to the parties.
Orders
- Application for judicial review dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (9)
- Judicature Act Cap 3 s.33
- Judicature Act Cap 3 s.36(1)(b)
- Judicature Act Cap 3 s.36(1)(c)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Non-Governmental Organisation Act 2016 s.7
- Non-Governmental Organisation Act 2016 s.7(2)
- Non-Governmental Organisation Act 2016 s.29(4)(a)
- Non-Governmental Organisation Act 2016 s.30(1)(c)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 42
Cases cited (4)
- John Jet Tumwebaze v Makerere University Council and 2 Others (Miscellaneous Cause No. 353 of 2005)
- Sahara India(Firm), Lucknow v Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1, [2008] 14 SCC 151
- Glynn v Keele University [1971] 1 W.L.R 487
- Pine v Law Society [2001]EWCA Civ 1574
Cases citing this judgment (1)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.