Hon. Odongo Otto v Electoral Commission (Misc Cause 102 of 2015)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that despite defective procedure, the court would treat the application as an appeal under Electoral Commission Act s.15 given the constitutional rights at stake. The omission of the applicant's name from the Voters' Register was an irregularity the Electoral Commission was obliged to correct. The Electoral Commission violated its constitutional mandate under Article 61(1)(e) to maintain and update the Register, and discriminated against the applicant in violation of Article 21 by treating him differently from other MPs in similar circumstances. Application allowed.
Outcome
Electoral Commission ordered to register applicant as voter; if delayed, applicant deemed registered for 2016 elections
Facts
The applicant, Hon. Odonga Otto, was a Member of Parliament who had registered as a voter in 2001 and participated in elections in 2001, 2006 and 2011. He was issued with a National ID in 2012 (Card No. 000000205 expiring 20 March 2015). He was informed he needed to re-register and did so at Kololo Independence Ground. When he went to collect his new National ID from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, he was told to sort out data transfer with the Electoral Commission. On 16 June 2015 he wrote to the Electoral Commission chairperson explaining his situation. On 19 June 2015 the chairperson replied declining to resolve the issue. The applicant alleged that other Members of Parliament in similar circumstances (Hon. Simon Lokodo, Hon. Peter Lokeris, and Hon. Asuman Kiyingi) had their data accepted and entered by the Electoral Commission. The applicant filed a miscellaneous cause seeking to have his name inserted in the Voters' Register. The Electoral Commission opposed the application, arguing the applicant had ignored time limits for voter registration.
Issues
- Whether the court could entertain the application despite it being brought by way of Notice of Motion rather than by petition as required under Electoral Commission Act s.15.
- Whether the Electoral Commission's refusal to insert the applicant's name in the Voters' Register constituted an irregularity that should be corrected.
- Whether the applicant was discriminated against in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution when other Members of Parliament in similar circumstances had their names entered in the Register.
Orders
- Application allowed.
- Electoral Commission ordered to enter the applicant's National ID particulars in the Voters' Register.
- Should there be any delay in executing the order, the applicant is declared a registered voter for purposes of 2016 elections.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (13)
- Constitution of Uganda Article 21(1)
- Constitution of Uganda Article 21(2)
- Constitution of Uganda Article 61(1)(e)
- Constitution of Uganda Article 126(2)(e)
- Constitution of Uganda Article 139
- Electoral Commission Act s.15(1)
- Electoral Commission Act s.15(2)
- Electoral Commission Act s.15(3)
- Electoral Commission Act s.15(4)
- Electoral Commission Act s.15(5)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 51
- Civil Procedure Rules s.52
Cases cited (1)
- Uganda v Commissioner of Prisons Ex Parte Matovu (1966) EA 514
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.