Houver v Morocco (Communication 41 of 1990)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights declared a communication inadmissible where it was directed against Morocco, a state that was not party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. The Commission held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider complaints against non-party states under Article 101 of its Rules of Procedure.
Outcome
Communication inadmissible due to lack of jurisdiction over non-party state
Facts
Andre Houver filed a communication dated 28 March 1990 with the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights alleging political imprisonment and other wrongdoing. The communication was directed against Morocco. The Commission considered the matter at its Seventh Ordinary Session held from 18 to 28 April 1990 in Banjul, The Gambia.
Issues
- Whether the African Commission has jurisdiction to consider a communication directed against a state that is not party to the African Charter.
Orders
- Communication declared inadmissible.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 30
- Rules of Procedure of the African Commission Article 101
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.