Ikandi v Rex (Criminal Appeal No. 174 of 1941)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that undistilled Nubian Gin (Muna) was not native spirituous liquor within the meaning of section 2 of the Native Liquor Ordinance, 1930. The term 'native spirituous liquor' as defined includes Nubian gin and other liquors prepared by natives by distillation. The word 'gin' connotes a liquor resulting from distillation. Charging possession of undistilled Nubian gin was fatal to conviction.
Outcome
Conviction on first count quashed
Facts
The appellant was charged with being in possession of about 360 gallons of undistilled Nubian Gin (Muna) in the Ngong Forest on 11 November 1941, contrary to section 4 of the Native Liquor Amendment Ordinance, 1941. A second count charged possession of apparatus for distilling Nubian Gin. The charge on the first count specifically described the substance as 'undistilled Nubian Gin Muna (Native Spirituous Liquor)'.
Issues
- Whether undistilled Nubian Gin (Muna) constituted 'native spirituous liquor' within the meaning of section 2 of the Native Liquor Ordinance, 1930
Orders
- Appeal on the first count allowed
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Native Liquor Amendment Ordinance 1941 s.4(1)
- Native Liquor Amendment Ordinance 1941 s.4(2)
- Native Liquor Ordinance 1930 s.2
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.