In Re Ayepei Steven & Ayepei Patrick(Infants) (Misc. Application No. 26 of 2013)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court upheld a preliminary objection on the ground that review of letters of administration is a contentious matter requiring evidence beyond affidavit evidence. The court held that the application was improperly before court and ordered that applicants should proceed by way of ordinary suit.
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs; applicants directed to proceed by way of ordinary suit
Facts
Two minors, suing through their mother as next friend, filed an application arising from an administration cause seeking to be recognized as beneficiaries of the estate of the late Ayepei Stephen Odele and to secure their interests in that estate. The application sought review of the grant of letters of administration, a declaration that the applicants were beneficiaries, and entrustment of their shares to their mother. The respondents raised a preliminary objection contending that the matter was contentious and improperly before the court.
Issues
- Whether the application for review of letters of administration and declaration of beneficiary status should proceed by way of affidavit evidence or by ordinary suit.
Orders
- Preliminary objection upheld.
- Application is improperly before court.
- Applicants to proceed by way of filing an ordinary suit.
- Costs of the preliminary objection awarded to the respondents.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (1)
- Henry Amanya Rwabitengye Vrs. Joan Kategaya
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.