In Re - of the Resident Magistrate's Court (Nairobi) Civil Case No. 217 of 1929 (John and Edward . C. S. Lezar); In Re -R of a Reference made by the Registrar, Supreme Court, Nairobi, therein in connexion with the payment out of the sum of
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court held that an advocate in Kenya has a common law lien on the proceeds of a judgment obtained through the advocate's labour, notwithstanding that the Solicitors Act 1860 does not apply in Kenya. The Kenya Order-in-Council 1921 Art.4(2) permits application of the common law lien doctrine. The advocate's lien takes priority over claims by judgment creditors to the funds paid into Court.
Outcome
Advocate's lien upheld; funds paid out to the advocate
Facts
A sum of Sh. 257.55 was paid into Court by an unsuccessful plaintiff-appellant to the credit of the successful defendant-respondent in Civil Case No. 217 of 1929 in the Resident Magistrate's Court, Nairobi. Mr. Birdsey, the advocate who represented the successful defendant in both the trial court and on appeal, claimed a lien on the entire sum for his costs. Judgment creditors claimed entitlement to a rateable distribution of the funds to the exclusion of Mr. Birdsey. The Registrar referred the dispute to the Supreme Court for a ruling. Mr. Birdsey argued that his lien arose through his instrumentality in securing his client's success in both courts.
Issues
- Whether an advocate has a common law lien on the proceeds of a judgment obtained through the advocate's exertions.
- Whether the Solicitors Act 1860 applies in Kenya.
- Whether the Kenya Order-in-Council 1921 Art.4(2) permits the application of the common law doctrine of advocate's lien.
Orders
- Ruling that Mr. Birdsey has a common law lien over the sum of Sh. 257.55 lying in Court.
- Funds to be paid out to Mr. Birdsey in satisfaction of his lien for costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Solicitors Act 1860 s.28
- Kenya Order-in-Council 1921 Art.4(2)
- Solicitors Act 1843
Cases cited (2)
- Rasul Bux v Gavasji Manekji Dalal (Civil Appeal No. 11 of 1912)
- In re Sullivan v Pearson, ex-parte Morrison (1868) 4 QB 153
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.