In the matter of a petition for adoption by Horning & Horning (Adoption Cause 19 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court held that where either the child or an applicant is not a Ugandan citizen, jurisdiction over an adoption petition lies with the High Court under section 86 of the Children Act. The American petitioners satisfied all statutory conditions for inter-country adoption, including age, one year's residence and fostering under a probation officer, absence of criminal record, favourable home study, and parental consent. Applying the welfare principle as paramount, the court found the child had suffered neglect and that his biological parents could not provide for him, while the petitioners offered a stable, loving home. The petition was granted, the petitioners appointed adoptive parents, and the change of the child's name permitted.
Outcome
Adoption order granted; petitioners appointed adoptive parents and child's name changed to Horning Ayebale Daniel
Facts
Ayebale Daniel, a Ugandan boy born on 1 September 2018 to Ugandan parents Mugenyi Matia Mulumba and Kabahweza Mary Gorret, was legally relinquished by his biological parents, who had neglected and abused him and could not provide for his basic needs. The petitioners, Horning Jeremy Seibel and Horning Faith Ann, both 40-year-old American citizens and missionaries married since 2005 with three biological children, arrived in Uganda in 2021 and have resided there since 6 July 2021 in Kawempe Division, Kampala. They began fostering the child on 16 August 2021, with formal foster placement by the Senior Probation and Social Welfare Officer on 10 May 2022. They were presented to the Ministry of Gender's Alternative Care Panel on 4 November 2022 and 28 March 2024, held recommendations for suitability, had no criminal record, and obtained a favourable home study report in Massachusetts. The biological parents consented to the adoption.
Issues
- Whether the High Court is seized with jurisdiction to entertain the adoption petition.
- Whether the petitioners qualify to be appointed the adoptive parents of the child.
- Whether the adoption petition is in the best interests of the child.
- Whether the child's name should be changed from Ayebale Daniel to Horning Ayebale Daniel.
Orders
- The petitioners Horning Jeremy Seibel and Horning Faith Ann are appointed the adoptive parents of the child Ayebale Daniel.
- The parental rights of all others in respect of the child, not previously terminated, are terminated.
- The petitioners shall have exclusive care, custody and control of the child free from claims of all others, and shall be responsible for his maintenance, education and support.
- The petitioners are allowed to change the child's name to Horning Ayebale Daniel.
- The Registrar General of Births and Deaths is directed to record this adoption in the Adopted Children Register.
- The Adoption Order shall be furnished to the Consular Department in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
- Costs of the petition shall be met by the petitioners.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (15)
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.3
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.86
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.86(1)(b)
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.87(1)(a)
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.88(1)(a)
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.88(1)(b)
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.88(c)
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.88(d)
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.88(1)(e)
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.88(6)
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.90
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.91
- Children Act, Cap. 62 s.91(1)(b)
- Children (Adoption of Children) Rules r.17
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 Article 10(b)
Cases cited (2)
- In re McGrath (Infants) [1893] 1 Ch 143
- Nakaggwa v Kigundu (1978) HCB 310
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.