In the Matter of an application by Isaac Mulindwa for Winding Up of M/S Lukuli Coffee Factory Limited (Companies Cause No. 32 of 2012)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court dismissed a minority shareholder's petition for winding up of the company on just and equitable grounds. The court found the petitioner had made deliberate falsehoods in his affidavit regarding company assets and operations, and that the petition was a vain attempt to evade accountability for his management of company affairs during his tenure as Managing Director. A false affidavit renders an application inherently unreliable and the applicant does not come to court with clean hands.
Outcome
Petition dismissed; new Board of Directors remains in place with mandate to pursue accountability from the petitioner for his period as Managing Director
Facts
Isaac Mulindwa, a minority shareholder and former Managing Director of Lukuli Coffee Factory Limited (incorporated 1962), petitioned to wind up the company on just and equitable grounds. He alleged the company had no assets, no audited accounts, and that he had been irregularly removed as Managing Director when a new Board was appointed in 2010 without his involvement. The company, through shareholder Angella Nansasi Ssemukuutu, opposed the petition. Evidence showed that under Mulindwa's management from 1994 to 2010, the company owned land at Lukuli which had been leased to MTN Uganda for USD 7,800 annually since 2001, generating income he did not account for. In 2010, other shareholders discovered the company was still registered and held meetings to appoint a new Board and demand accountability from Mulindwa. The Registrar of Companies endorsed the majority shareholders' decision when Mulindwa failed to attend a scheduled meeting. Mulindwa's affidavit contained demonstrable falsehoods regarding company assets and operations, contradicted by his own later concessions on oath.
Issues
- Whether it is just and equitable to wind up Lukuli Coffee Factory Limited on the grounds alleged by the petitioner.
- Whether the petitioner came to court with clean hands having made false statements on oath regarding the company's assets and operations.
Orders
- Petition dismissed.
- Costs of the petition awarded to the petitioner to bear.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Companies Act Cap 110 s.211
- Companies Act Cap 110 s.212(f)
- Companies (Winding Up) Rules S.I. 110-2
Cases cited (1)
- Bitaitana v Kananura [1977] HCB 34
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.