In the matter of application for extension of probate by Karugaba and Others (HCT-01-CV-MA-0071-2025)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court allowed an oral amendment to the Notice of Motion to include prayers for validation of the inventory. The court validated the inventory filed on 10 July 2025, finding sufficient cause for the delay due to bureaucratic challenges in managing a complex estate with international assets. The court extended the grant of probate for a further two years from the date of the ruling, finding that all statutory conditions under Section 255(3) and Section 337(4) of the Succession Act were satisfied, including beneficiary consent and compliance with statutory requirements.
Outcome
Application granted; probate extended for two years to enable completion of estate administration
Facts
The late Reuben Karugaba died having appointed five executors in his will. Probate was granted on 24 April 2013. The estate comprised substantial assets including bank accounts in Uganda, England, and Kenya, company shares in four companies, insurance policies, and multiple immovable properties in Kampala, Fort Portal, and other areas. Administration remained incomplete due to delays in transferring four properties and certain bank accounts to beneficiaries. The executors attributed delays to bureaucratic and technical challenges in ascertaining and harmonizing foreign bank accounts outside the court's jurisdiction, and to procedural oversight in filing the inventory. The probate was set to expire on 31 May 2025 under Section 337(2) of the Succession Act. All six beneficiaries consented to the extension. The executors had resealed the probate in London to manage foreign assets.
Issues
- Whether the oral amendment to the Notice of Motion should be allowed.
- Whether there is sufficient cause to grant an extension of time to file the inventory or validate the one already filed.
- Whether the grant of probate should be extended, and if so, for what period.
Orders
- The inventory filed by the Applicants on 10th July 2025, is hereby validated.
- The grant of probate issued to Naomi Karugaba, Solomon Nyakahuma, Kenneth Kyamulesire, Joy Karake, and Japheth Kato on 24th April 2013, in respect of the estate of the late Reuben Karugaba, is renewed and extended for a further period of two (2) years from the date of delivery of this Ruling.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (10)
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.255(2)
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.255(3)
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.273(1)
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.337
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.337(2)
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.337(4)
- Judicature Act Cap 16 s.14
- Civil Procedure Act Cap 282 s.98
- Civil Procedure Rules S.I. 71-1 Order 52 Rules 1, 2, and 3
- Civil Procedure Rules S.I. 71-1 Order 6 Rule 19
Cases cited (4)
- Uganda Petroleum Co Ltd v Hajji Kayongo (Civil Suit No. 504 of 1993)
- Margaret Nkangi Tomusange v Fred Tomusange and Others (HCMA No. 4067 of 2025)
- Molly Kyalikunda Turinawe and Others v Eng Ephraim Turinawe and Another (SCCA No. 27 of 2010)
- Abubaker Sebalamu Ganya v Yasmin Nalwoga (SCCA No. 14 of 2017)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.