In the matter of the Estate of Nakide Nyese (Miscellaneous Cause No. 25 of 2025)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that a beneficiary under a will does not automatically acquire the status or authority of an executor merely by virtue of being named as a beneficiary. Where a will makes no express or implied appointment of an executor, a grant of probate cannot issue. The proper remedy is for the beneficiary to apply for Letters of Administration with the Will annexed under Section 240(3) of the Succession Act. The Court found sufficient cause for the thirty-six-year delay, attributing it to financial constraints and lack of legal knowledge, and granted leave to petition for Letters of Administration with the Will annexed out of time.
Outcome
Leave granted to petition for Letters of Administration with the Will annexed; prayer for probate refused
Facts
The deceased, Nakide Nyese, died testate on 6 October 1989, having executed a Will dated 6 May 1985 in which she bequeathed three acres of land at Nakalya, Busiro, to the Applicant, Kiyingi Michael Ezra, her nephew who had cared for her. The Applicant did not petition for probate within the one-year statutory period prescribed under Section 240(2) of the Succession Act. Approximately thirty-six years after the deceased's death, the Applicant filed this application seeking leave to petition for probate out of time, citing financial constraints and lack of knowledge of the legal requirement as reasons for the delay. Upon examination of the Will, the Court found that while the Testatrix made a clear bequest in favour of the Applicant, she did not expressly appoint him or any other person as executor of her estate. There was no evidence of competing claims to the estate or bad faith on the part of the Applicant.
Issues
- Whether the Applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause to justify a delay of approximately thirty-six years in petitioning for probate.
- Whether the Applicant, as a beneficiary under the Will, is entitled to apply for probate in the absence of an express appointment as executor.
- Whether the Court should exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act to extend time in the interest of justice.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the Applicant, Kiyingi Michael Ezra, to petition for Letters of Administration with the Will annexed in respect of the estate of the late Nakide Nyese, out of time.
- The prayer for leave to petition for Probate is hereby not granted, as the Applicant is not an executor within the meaning of Section 2 of the Succession Act.
- The Applicant shall file the said petition within thirty (30) days from the date of this ruling.
- There shall be no order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (6)
- Succession Act s.240(2)
- Succession Act s.240(3)
- Succession Act s.2
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Civil Procedure Rules O.52 r.1
- Civil Procedure Rules O.52 r.3
Cases cited (4)
- Pius Ocuwai v Margaret Ocuwai (Miscellaneous Application No. 662 of 2003)
- Tushabe Cris v Co-operative Bank Ltd (Civil Application No. 08 of 2013)
- Bishop Jacinto Kibuuka v The Uganda Catholic Lawyers' Society & 2 Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 696 of 2018)
- Wakabala & Co. Advocates v Christopher Banyenzaki (Miscellaneous Application No. 802 of 2019)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.