In the Matter of the Estate of the Late John Bwesigye (Administration Cause 209 of 1997; HCT-05-FD-MA-781-2025)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court held that once a grant of probate expires by operation of law under section 337(2) of the Succession Act, it cannot be revoked as it is no longer valid. Only a named executor has locus standi to apply for renewal of an expired grant under section 337(4). The applicant, not being a named executor, lacked standing to seek renewal. The court advised that beneficiaries should instead apply for letters of administration with will annexed.
Outcome
Application dismissed; applicant advised to apply for letters of administration with will annexed
Facts
Vincent Senyondo was granted probate to the estate of the late John Bwesigye on 30 October 1997. Senyondo died on 12 March 2024. Under section 337(2) of the Succession Act, grants of probate issued before 31 May 2022 remained in force for three years from that date, meaning the grant expired on 31 May 2025. On 15 October 2025, Mukundane Fide, the widow of the deceased testator, applied to revoke Senyondo's name from the grant, extend the probate, and have it granted to her instead. The beneficiaries consented to the application.
Issues
- Whether the court can revoke a grant of probate that has already expired by operation of law.
- Whether the applicant, not being a named executor in the expired grant of probate, has locus standi to seek renewal of the grant.
- What remedies are available to beneficiaries when an executor dies after the grant of probate has expired.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (9)
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.337(2)
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.337(4)
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.230(1)
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.230(2)(d)
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.230(5)
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.255(2)
- Succession Act Cap 268 s.255(3)
- Civil Procedure Act Cap 282 s.98
- Civil Procedure Rules S.I. 71-1 Order 52 Rules 1, 2 & 3
Cases citing this judgment (1)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.