International Development Consultants Ltd v AECOM RoA (RTY) Ltd and Anor (CAD ARB 67 of 2017)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The tribunal appointed an arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the applicant and first respondent arising under a sub-consultancy contract. The sub-consultancy contract incorporated by reference the arbitration clause from the main contract between UNRA and the first respondent. The tribunal found that UNRA was not a party to the sub-consultancy agreement and ordered the applicant to bear UNRA's costs.
Outcome
Arbitrator appointed for dispute between applicant and first respondent
Facts
A sub-consultancy agreement was concluded between AECOM RoA (Pty) Ltd (first respondent) and International Development Consultants Ltd (applicant) for consultancy services relating to the upgrading of the Mpigi-Kanoni-Sembabule Road. The main contract was between Uganda National Roads Authority (UNRA, second respondent) and AECOM RoA (Pty) Ltd. A dispute arose between the applicant and first respondent under the sub-consultancy contract. The High Court had ordered that the disputed amount be held pending arbitration. The sub-consultancy contract incorporated the arbitration clause from the main contract, which provided for arbitration in accordance with Ugandan law with Kampala as the seat. The applicant applied for appointment of an arbitrator, naming both AECOM and UNRA as respondents.
Issues
- Whether the tribunal has jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator for the dispute between the applicant and first respondent under the sub-consultancy contract.
- Whether the second respondent (UNRA) is a proper party to the arbitration proceedings.
Orders
- Arbitrator appointed to resolve dispute between applicant and first respondent.
- Applicant to bear the second respondent's costs.
- Applicant and first respondent to each bear their own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.