Isingoma v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 206 of 2015; Criminal Appeal 451 of 2015)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that a rape conviction resting on contradictory identification of a hooded, previously-unknown assailant in poor light was unsafe; appeal allowed and conviction quashed.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Isingoma applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.