Jane Buwande Guweddeko and Others v Muyanja Raphael Sseddugge and Another (Civil Suit No. 372 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court Land Division ruled that a civil suit abates under Order 11A rule 1(6) of the Civil Procedure Rules where the plaintiff fails to take any steps to prosecute the case or apply for Summons for Directions after filing a reply to the written statement of defence. No orders as to costs were made.
Outcome
Suit abated for failure to prosecute
Facts
The plaintiffs instituted a civil suit on 23 April 2024 seeking a declaration that the first defendant was a trespasser on land comprised in Busiro Block 401-402 Plot No. 1224 at Namulanda. The defendants filed their written statement of defence on 29 May 2024. The plaintiffs replied to the defence on 4 April 2025. After filing the reply, the plaintiffs took no further steps to prosecute the case and did not apply for Summons for Directions as required by Order 11A rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Issues
- Whether the suit should abate for failure to prosecute.
Orders
- The suit abates under Order 11A rule 1(6) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
- No orders as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.