Jjuko v Bwende (Miscellaneous Application 220 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
An amended written statement of defence with counterclaim filed more than twenty-eight days after the original defence without leave of court is incompetent and must be struck out. Order 6 Rule 21 of the Civil Procedure Rules requires leave for amendments after twenty-eight days. A court has no residual jurisdiction to enlarge statutory time limits.
Outcome
Amended written statement of defence and counterclaim struck out for being filed out of time without leave of court
Facts
The plaintiff filed a civil suit against four defendants. After withdrawal against the third defendant and service of an amended plaint, the first defendant filed a written statement of defence on 28 August 2024. A scheduling conference was held on 3 September 2024 and the matter was fixed for hearing on 29 October 2024. On 25 October 2024, the first defendant filed an amended written statement of defence with a counterclaim without seeking leave of court. The applicant/plaintiff filed this application seeking to strike out the amended pleading as being filed out of time and without leave.
Issues
- Whether the amended written statement of defence with counterclaim was filed out of time.
- Whether leave of court was secured before filing the amended written statement of defence with counterclaim.
- What remedies are available.
Orders
- Application allowed.
- Amended written statement of defence filed on 25 October 2024 struck out.
- Counterclaim filed on 25 October 2024 struck out.
- Costs of the application awarded to the applicant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
Cases cited (2)
- Naggayi v Lwanga (Civil Appeal No. 30 of 2019)
- Makula International Limited v His Eminence Cardinal Nsubuga & Anor (Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 4 of 1981)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.