Joyce Akello v Apac District (M.A. 82 Of 2008) (M.A. 82 of 2008)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court granted leave to file an application for judicial review by way of mandamus and certiorari concerning a subcounty chief's written report on a marriage relationship between parties involved in divorce proceedings in the United Kingdom. The court found the issues raised were serious enough to warrant judicial review.
Outcome
Leave granted to proceed with judicial review application
Facts
The applicant sought leave to file a judicial review application challenging a decision by the subcounty chief of Apac District who issued a written report concerning a marriage relationship (or absence thereof) between Joyce Lanek and Richard Lanek. Both parties were living in the United Kingdom and were involved in divorce proceedings. The application was supported by an affidavit of Muhumuza Julius.
Issues
- Whether leave should be granted to file an application for judicial review of a subcounty chief's written report concerning a marriage relationship
Orders
- Leave granted to the applicant to file an application for judicial review within the period prescribed by the Rules.
- Costs of this application to abide the event in the substantive application.
Rules and key headnotes
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.