Kaahwa v Attorney General [2018] UGHRC 30
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Tribunal held that police officers violated the complainant's constitutional rights by torturing him during arrest and detention, including beating him severely and tying a stone to his testicles, and by detaining him unlawfully for two weeks without charge. The Attorney General was held vicariously liable and ordered to pay UGX 19,800,000 in general damages.
Outcome
Complaint allowed; complainant awarded damages for torture and unlawful detention
Facts
In June 2008, the complainant was arrested by police officers from Iruhura and Rweihamba Police Posts on suspicion of stealing a gun belonging to a Special Police Constable. During arrest and while detained at Fort Portal Police Station, he was severely beaten with batons, kicked, and slapped. Police officers tied a stone to his testicles and ordered him to jump, and pierced his testicles with a needle and compass to force a confession. He was detained for two weeks without charge or court appearance, then released. After release, he was admitted to Fort Portal Regional Referral Hospital for two and a half weeks. The gun was recovered from his village while he was still in detention. The respondent called no defence witnesses and provided no explanation for the injuries sustained in custody.
Issues
- Whether the complainant's right of freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment was violated by State agents.
- Whether the complainant's right to personal liberty was violated by State agents.
- Whether the respondent is liable for the violations.
- Whether the complainant is entitled to any remedies.
Orders
- Complaint wholly allowed.
- Attorney General ordered to pay complainant UGX 19,800,000 as general damages.
- UGX 15,000,000 awarded for violation of freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
- UGX 4,800,000 awarded for violation of right to personal liberty.
- Interest at 10% per annum on total amount from date of decision until payment in full.
- Each party to bear their own costs.
- Either party may appeal to the High Court within thirty days from date of decision.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (15)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 24
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 44
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 23
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 23(1)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 23(4)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 23(4)(b)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 50(1)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 53(2)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 119
- Evidence Act Cap 6 s.101(1)
- Evidence Act Cap 6 s.102
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 Article 5
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1996 Article 7
- Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 1984 Article 1
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights 1981 Article 5
Cases cited (5)
- Aksoy v Turkey (1995) 21 EHRR 573
- Muwonge v Attorney General [1967] EA 17
- Ojok Alex v Attorney General (UHRC Complaint No. GLU/3/2005)
- Mugisa John Bosco and Bizimungu Alex v Attorney General (UHRC Complaint No. 097/2003)
- Matiya Byabalema and Others v Uganda Transport Company (SCCA No. 10/193)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.