Kaahwa v Kawino (Divorce Cause 127 of 2023)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that a valid church marriage existed and was dissolved on the ground of desertion under section 4(f) of the Divorce Act Cap. 144. The respondent deserted the petitioner for over 10 years without reasonable excuse, abandoning the matrimonial home and moving to Finland with no communication. Both the physical separation (de facto) and mental element (animus deserendi) necessary for desertion were proved. The jointly acquired matrimonial property was ordered to be valued and shared equally between the parties.
Outcome
Marriage dissolved by Decree Nisi; matrimonial property to be valued and divided equally
Facts
The petitioner and respondent celebrated a customary marriage on 12 September 2009 and a church marriage on 19 September 2009 at All Saints Cathedral Kampala. They lived together in Bunga, Makindye Division. In 2011, the respondent left home ostensibly to attend church prayers and never returned. The petitioner searched for her through relatives and friends. He later learned from the respondent's friend that she had travelled to Finland. He obtained her telephone number but she never responded to his messages. The respondent remained absent for over 10 years with no communication or explanation. During their marriage they jointly acquired land comprised in Block 395 Plot 2194 at Kitende, Wakiso District. They have no children. The respondent was served by substituted service granted on 10 October 2023 but filed no response. The matter proceeded exparte.
Issues
- Whether there are any grounds for the dissolution of marriage between the Petitioner and the Respondent?
- What remedies are available to the Parties?
Orders
- The marriage between the Petitioner and the Respondent is hereby dissolved.
- A Decree Nisi is hereby granted.
- The Property acquired by the Petitioner and the Respondent comprised in Block 395 Plot 2194 Land at Kitende on Entebbe Road, Busiro, Wakiso District measuring approximately 25 decimals shall be valued and shared equally among the Petitioner and the Respondent.
- Upon the sale of the suit property, the Petitioner shall present to this court, evidence of distribution to the Respondent's share to her mother.
- No award to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (11)
- Divorce Act Cap. 144 s.2(a)
- Divorce Act Cap. 144 s.3(2)
- Divorce Act Cap. 144 s.4
- Divorce Act Cap. 144 s.4(f)
- Marriage Act Cap. 146 s.31
- Marriage Act Cap. 144 s.33
- Evidence Act Cap. 8 s.101
- Evidence Act Cap. 8 s.102
- Evidence Act Cap. 8 s.103
- Civil Procedure Rules SI 71-1 Order 9 Rule 11(2)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 31(1)
Cases cited (5)
- Kintu Muwanga v Kintu (Divorce Appeal No. 135 of 1997)
- Lang v Lang [1995] AC 402
- Santos v Santos [1972] Fam 247
- Charman v Charman (No 4) [2007] EWCA Civ 503
- Rwabinumi v Bahimbisomwe (Civil Appeal No. 10 of 2009)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.