Wakilii

Kabagambe Gertrude Gladys, Kabagambe Peter Kaganzi & Tusiime Prilla Kabagambe v Stanbic Bank Uganda Limited (Miscellaneous Cause 570 of 2023)

High Court · [2023] UGHC 570 Application Granted AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application under Order 52 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking access to deceased's bank account
Decision
Executors granted access to deceased's bank account and probate ordered to be registered with the bank

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that where sufficient evidence on record demonstrates that the deceased pensioner and the bank account holder are the same person despite discrepancies in names, executors are entitled to access the account using letters of probate. The court ordered the bank to register the probate and grant executors access to the account despite the name variation between the probate and the account holder's name.

Outcome

Executors granted access to deceased's bank account and probate ordered to be registered with the bank

Facts

The late Benon Kabagambe was a pensioner of Mbarara District Local Government who received his pension through account number 9030001692983 at Stanbic Bank Mbarara Branch. The applicants were granted probate on 25 October 2022 as executors of the estate of the late Benon Kabagambe. The bank account was held in the names Kabagambe Ben C.N., while the probate was issued in the names of the estate of the late Benon Kabagambe. Due to this discrepancy, the bank denied the executors access to the account. Bank statements showed monthly pension deposits from Mbarara District Local Government into the account. The deceased's national identity card bore the name Benon Kabagambe. The executors sought court orders directing the bank to grant them access to the account.

Issues

  1. Whether the Applicants are entitled to access Kabagambe Ben C.N.'s account number 9030001692983 held by the Respondent Bank using letters of probate to the estate of Kabagambe Benon?
  2. What remedies are available to the parties?

Orders

  • The application is granted.
  • The Executors of the Estate of the late Kabagambe Benon vide AC 329 of 2022 be granted access to account number 9030001692983 in Stanbic Bank, Mbarara Branch in the names of Kabgambe Ben C.N.
  • The letters of Probate of the Estate of the late Kabagambe Benon vide AC 329 of 2022 be registered with the respondent bank in respect to account number 9030001692983 in Stanbic Bank, Mbarara Branch in the names of Kabgambe Ben C.N.
  • Each party will cater for its own costs.

Rules and key headnotes

Executors — Powers and Duties — Access to Deceased's Bank Accounts
Executors granted probate have a duty to search for and manage property of the deceased with reasonable diligence, which includes accessing bank accounts held by the deceased.
Bank Accounts — Name Discrepancies — Executor Access
Where sufficient evidence demonstrates that the deceased and the bank account holder are the same person despite discrepancies in names, the bank cannot refuse executors access to the account on the basis of name variations alone.
Registration of Persons — Name Changes — Posthumous Correction
A deceased person cannot rectify anomalies in names with a bank, and executors cannot correct discrepancies in names after the passing of the account holder under the Registration of Persons Act 2015.
Time Limits for Executors — Succession Amendment Act 2022
Under section 258(2) of the Succession Act as amended in 2022, a person to whom probate was granted after 10 April 2022 shall carry out duties and functions for a period not exceeding two years.

Legislation cited (6)

Cases cited (1)

  • Catherine Osupelem v Electoral Commission (Electoral Petition No. 002 of 2018)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Kabagambe Gertrude Gladys, Kabagambe Peter Kaganzi & Tusiime Prilla Kabagambe v Stanbic Bank Uganda Limited (Miscellaneous Cause 570 of 2023) [2023] U
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.