Kabaganda Wambale v Muyesa Wambale & 2 Ors (HCT-04-CV-MA-225-2009)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that a temporary injunction would issue where the applicant demonstrated a pending suit raising serious triable issues concerning a family dwelling, likelihood of irreparable loss if the status quo were disturbed, and balance of convenience in her favour. The court found that the applicant's uncontested affidavit established that her husband had given power of attorney to a third party who mortgaged the family home, creating a risk of substantial injury not adequately compensable by monetary damages.
Outcome
Temporary injunction granted pending hearing of main suit
Facts
The applicant Ruth Kabaganda Wambale sought a temporary injunction concerning property at Block No.3 Plot 7, Moni Central, Mbale Municipality, which served as the family residence for herself and five children. Her husband had given the second respondent, Khayemba Mubaraka, power of attorney to borrow money using the suit property as security. Khayemba Mubaraka mortgaged the property to Equity Bank (third respondent). The applicant learned of the mortgage and lodged a caveat. She filed Civil Suit 045 of 2009 challenging the mortgage transaction. None of the respondents filed a written statement of defence or contested the application.
Issues
- Whether the applicant satisfied the conditions for the grant of a temporary injunction.
Orders
- A temporary injunction doth issue restraining the respondents from dealing in the suit property, intimidating, threatening or in any way interrupting the applicant's use and quiet enjoyment of the suit property situate in Block No.3 Plot 7 at Moni Central Mbale Municipality.
- Costs of the application in the cause.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Cases cited (1)
- Sole Electric (U) Ltd v Town Clerk KK & Nakibuka Enterprises (1992) 1 KALR 182
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.