Wakilii

Kabaka of Buganda v Nakibirango Bernadette and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 130 of 2025)

High Court · [2025] UGHCLD 291 · 2025 Application Stayed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for review of judgment arising from civil suit concerning land title cancellation
Decision
Application stayed pending determination of Constitutional Petition No. 84 of 2023

Observed later treatment

Cited — treatment unverified cited in 1 (treatment unverified) Sequitur — Uganda’s citator · Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

No adverse treatment recorded Cited 1 time with no adverse treatment recorded; not yet tested on the merits. Citations rising — 3 citing cases on record, 3 in the most recent three data years. Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — a deterministic signal, not legal advice.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Application for review of judgment stayed pending final determination of Constitutional Petition No. 84 of 2023 concerning Succession Registers. The estate of the late Lazaro Nsi-egulamirambo falls under Succession Registers and is affected by recommendations of a Joint Working Committee currently subject to constitutional challenge. The Constitutional Court's decision will bind this Court and affect determination of the review application.

Outcome

Application stayed pending determination of Constitutional Petition No. 84 of 2023

Facts

The Applicant sought review of a judgment in Civil Suit No. 20 of 2022, which had ordered reinstatement of a certificate of title for land comprised in Kibuga Block 16 Plot 1078. The original suit was brought by administrators of the estate of Lazaro Nsi-egulamirambo (deceased 1919) against the Commissioner Land Registration, challenging cancellation of the title. The Commissioner had cancelled the title on grounds it formed part of Official Mailo belonging to the Kabaka of Buganda. The estate falls under historical Succession Registers maintained by the Lukiiko (Buganda Parliament) from 1912-1966, later transferred to the Administrator General. A Joint Working Committee in 2020-2023 investigated challenges with Succession Registers and recommended no further grants be issued on such estates. These recommendations are now subject to Constitutional Petition No. 84 of 2023.

Issues

  1. Whether the Applicant is an aggrieved person entitled to seek review of the judgment in Civil Suit No. 20 of 2022.
  2. Whether the application for review should be stayed pending determination of a related Constitutional Petition.

Orders

  • The instant application, MA 130 of 2025, arising from Civil Suit No. 20 of 2022, and all pending matters related to the Estate of the late Lazaro Nsi-egulamirambo, are hereby stayed until the final determination of Constitutional Petition No. 84 of 2023 and any Constitutional appeal arising therefrom.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Review of Judgment — Stay of Proceedings — Pending Constitutional Petition
Where an application for review concerns an estate falling under Succession Registers and the validity of administrative processes relating to such estates is subject to a pending Constitutional Petition, the High Court should stay the review application until final determination of the Constitutional Petition, as the Constitutional Court's decision will bind the High Court and affect the determination of the review.

Legislation cited (5)

Cases cited (1)

  • Lufunya Derrick and Another v Attorney General and Others (Constitutional Petition No. 84 of 2023)

Cases citing this judgment (1)

How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Kabaka_of_Buganda_v_Nakibirango_Bernadette_and_Another_(Miscellaneous_Application_No._130_of_2025)_[2025]_UGHCLD_291_(30_July_2025)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.