Kabei v Kidawalime Bakery Limited (Civil Suit 154 of 2020)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The plaintiff failed to prove that bread purchased from a retail shop was unfit for human consumption at the time it left the defendant manufacturer's factory, as required in product liability negligence claims. No expert evidence was adduced to establish the bread's condition when it left the factory, and no evidence linked the allegedly adulterated bread to the defendant's production. The suit was dismissed with costs to the defendant.
Outcome
Suit dismissed
Facts
On 25 May 2020, the plaintiff purchased a one-kilogram loaf of bread for UGX 4,500 from a retail shop at Kisaasi, Kampala. The bread was wrapped in packaging bearing the defendant's brand name. After consuming several slices, the plaintiff discovered the bread contained dirty material thread. The plaintiff suffered alleged mental shock and emotional distress. He contacted the defendant by telephone but received no positive response. The defendant denied ownership of the bread, asserting that counterfeit products using its packaging had emerged due to increased market competition. The defendant's witnesses acknowledged the packaging resembled theirs but denied the bread was produced at their factory. The plaintiff refused to disclose his location or the retailer's identity to the defendant's employees who sought to investigate.
Issues
- Whether the alleged bread was unfit for human consumption at the time of the purchase.
- Whether the alleged bread was produced and supplied by the defendant.
- What remedies are available to the parties.
Orders
- The suit is dismissed.
- Costs of the suit are awarded to the defendant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
Cases cited (1)
- Kalemera Godfrey and 2 Others v Unilever (U) Limited and Another (High Court Civil Suit No. 1181 of 1997)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.