Kalungi Estates Limited v Bahari Forwarders Limited and Others [2023] UGHC 555
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the application for review was dismissed. The alleged errors on the face of the record were accidental slips or omissions correctable under section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act, not grounds for review. The application amounted to a disguised appeal. Once a court makes a ruling it becomes functus officio and cannot revisit the same matter. The proper remedy for an aggrieved party is to appeal, not to seek review on misconstrued grounds.
Outcome
Application for review dismissed with costs to the respondents
Facts
Kalungi Estates Limited applied for review of a Ruling in Miscellaneous Appeal 15/2022. The applicant alleged errors on the face of the record, including that the Ruling indicated five respondents when the parties in the appeal were only Kalungi Estates Limited and Kasumba Ali, and that the Ruling cited Article 126(e) instead of Article 126(2)(e) of the Constitution. The applicant also challenged the basis for dismissal of its appeal, which was failure to extract an order. The court found these were accidental slips correctable under section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act, not grounds for review, and that the application was a disguised appeal.
Issues
- Whether the applicant demonstrated grounds for review of the Ruling in Miscellaneous Appeal 15/2022 under Order 46 rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondents.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
Cases cited (1)
- F.X. Mubuuke v UEB (HCIA No. 98 of 2005)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.