Kamiza and Another v Uganda Beverages, Tabacco and Allied Workers Union (Labour Dispute Reference 38 of 2022)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Industrial Court has jurisdiction to hear disputes between union officials and their union concerning dismissal from elected positions and financial management. The Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 confers jurisdiction on the Industrial Court over disputes relating to union management and financial issues under sections 47 and 52, even where no employer-employee relationship exists. The Court's jurisdiction is not limited to traditional employment disputes but extends to all labour matters referred to it under statute.
Outcome
Preliminary objection dismissed; matter to proceed to hearing on merits
Facts
The two claimants were employees of Century Bottling Company Limited who joined the respondent trade union. In 2017, the first claimant was elected Chairperson and the second claimant was elected Committee Member of the union branch. Four percent of their salaries were deducted as union dues. Following their enquiries into deductions by the union, on 12 October 2020, the union's General Secretary terminated their union leadership positions. Their appeal to the union's Delegates Conference was unsuccessful. They lodged a complaint with the Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development. On 18 February 2022, a Labour Officer referred the matter to the Industrial Court. The claimants sought declarations that their dismissal was irregular, wrongful and unlawful, that the meeting at which they were dismissed was contrary to natural justice, and that the union branch was entitled to 30% of branch returns amounting to UGX 59,277,577. They also claimed UGX 100,000,000 in general damages. The respondent union raised a preliminary objection that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter, arguing it was an internal union matter and not an employer-employee dispute.
Issues
- Whether the Industrial Court of Uganda has jurisdiction to hear claims by members of a labour union against the union concerning their dismissal from elected union positions and financial irregularities.
Orders
- Preliminary objection overruled.
- Court has jurisdiction to entertain the dispute under the Labour Unions Act Cap. 228.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (25)
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.1
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.2
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.3
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.5(1)
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.6(3)
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.7
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.20
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.22(2)
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.22(3)
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.23(6)
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.36
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.38(4)
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.41
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.47
- Labour Unions Act Cap. 228 s.52
- Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act 2006 s.2
- Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act 2006 s.5
- Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act 2006 s.6
- Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act 2006 s.8
- Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act 2006 s.8(1)(b)
- Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act 2006 s.8(2)
- Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Amendment Act 2020 s.3(2)(a)
- Constitution of Uganda Article 29(1)(e)
- Employment Act 2006
- Workers Compensation Act Cap. 233
Cases cited (17)
- National Medical Stores v Penguins Ltd [2012] UGCommC 35
- Mujib Juma v Adam Musa & Ors [2018] UGHCLD 27
- Makula International Ltd v His Eminence Cardinal Nsubuga & Anor [1982] UGSC 2
- Asaph Ruhinda Ntegye & Anor v Attorney General [2017] UGCC 3
- Attorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania v African Network of Animal Welfare (Appeal No. 3 of 2014)
- Kamukama v Summit Project Limited [2023] UGIC 54
- Baku Raphael Obudra and Another v Attorney General (2006) UGSC 5
- Owners of Motor Vessel Lillian 's' v Caltex Oil Kenya Limited [1989] KLR 1
- Ozuu Brothers v Ayikoru Milka (H.C.C.R. 006 of 2016)
- Kyaka and Anor v Attorney General [2021] UGIC 37
- Mugyenzi v Uganda Electricity Generation Co. Ltd (Civil Appeal No. 167 of 2018)
- Makuza v Civil Aviation Authority & Another [2024] UGIC 57
- Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance [1968] 2 QB 497
- Michael Tumukunde v Leading Distillers (LDR 002 of 2021)
- Habre International Co. Limited v Kassam & Others [1999] UGSC 31
- George Joshua Okungu v Kenya Pipeline Company Limited & Others [2016] KEELRC 666
- Komakech v Muttico Technical Services Limited and Another [2024] UGIC 25
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.