Kampala Capital City Authority v Shumuk Investments Limited (Miscellaneous Cause No. 64 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that where a local government has complied with statutory procedures for property valuation, published the valuation list, allowed objections, and issued proper demand notices, and the property owner has failed to pay rates due within the statutory period, the High Court has jurisdiction to issue a summary warrant for recovery where the amount exceeds magistrates' court pecuniary jurisdiction. Application allowed. Summary warrant issued for UGX 123,284,491 in property rates arrears plus continuing penalties at 2% per month.
Outcome
Summary warrant issued for recovery of property rates arrears
Facts
Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) conducted a property valuation exercise in 2018 for Nakawa Division, which included eight industrial and commercial properties owned by Shumuk Investments Limited. KCCA published a gazette notice on 21 March 2018 notifying the public of the draft valuation list and inviting objections within 30 days. The Respondent did not object. The valuation list came into force on 1 July 2018. Property rates became payable in two instalments annually on 30 September and 31 December. The Respondent defaulted on payments. KCCA issued a statutory demand notice on 2 May 2023 (dated 2 July 2022) demanding UGX 105,754,696.58. A further demand notice was issued on 10 August 2023 for UGX 120,472,584. The Respondent failed to pay within the two-month statutory period. As at the application date, the Respondent's liability stood at UGX 123,284,491. KCCA applied for a summary warrant. The Respondent appeared but filed no affidavit in reply and no submissions.
Issues
- Whether the application for a summary warrant should be allowed.
Orders
- A summary warrant issues to the Applicant for the recovery of UGX 123,284,491 due to it in property rates from the Respondent in respect of the Respondent's industrial and commercial properties located in Nakawa Division, Kampala City.
- The Applicant is entitled to recover any penalty that continues to accrue at the statutory rate of 2% per month from 28 June 2024 until full payment.
- Costs of this application are awarded to the Applicant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (18)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Local Governments (Rating) Act Cap 140 s.14
- Local Governments (Rating) Act Cap 140 s.18
- Local Governments (Rating) Act Cap 140 s.21
- Local Governments (Rating) Act Cap 140 s.21(1)
- Local Governments (Rating) Act Cap 140 s.28(1)
- Local Governments (Rating) Act Cap 140 s.28(3)
- Local Governments (Rating) Regulations r.3
- Local Governments (Rating) Regulations r.4
- Local Governments (Rating) Regulations r.5
- Civil Procedure Rules O.52 r.1
- Civil Procedure Rules O.52 r.3
- Kampala Capital City Authority Act Cap 195 s.62
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 art.139
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 art.152
- Judicature Act Cap 16 s.14
- Magistrates Courts Act Cap 19 s.206
- Civil Procedure Act Cap 282 s.27
Cases cited (2)
- Kampala Capital City Authority v Aya Investments (U) Ltd (Miscellaneous Cause No. 10 of 2019)
- Kampala Capital City Authority v Ham Enterprises (U) Ltd (Miscellaneous Cause No. 13 of 2023)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.