Kampala Phamaceuticals vs Gullaballi Ushalan (Civil Appeal No 49 of 1997)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court of Appeal held that where a fixed-term employment contract contains an express clause permitting termination on notice, damages for premature termination are limited to salary and allowances for the notice period, not the whole unexpired term. The trial judge erred in using a 51-month multiplier; a six-month multiplier ought to have applied. Damages for breach of an employment contract are compensatory, not punitive, and cannot include compensation for injured feelings. The employee, being highly qualified, should have mitigated her loss. The special damages award was reduced to six months' salary (Shs.1,200,000) and overseas allowance (US$12,000). The general damages of Shs.4.9m were set aside as based on wrong principle.
Outcome
Appeal allowed; damages reduced to six months' salary (Shs.1,200,000) and six months' overseas allowance (US$12,000)
Facts
In January 1991 the respondent entered a written five-year fixed-term employment contract with the appellant, effective 4 December 1991 to 3 December 1996, as Quantity Control Manager. Her emoluments were a salary of Shs.200,000 per month and an overseas allowance of US$2,000 per month, plus fringe benefits. She worked and was paid for only nine months. Her employer persuaded her to take overseas leave in early 1992, and on her return the company had changed its name from Inlex Pharmaceuticals Ltd to Kampala Pharmaceuticals Ltd. The new company neither assigned her work nor terminated her contract. She did not terminate it herself, fearing loss of benefits. She filed suit on 14 May 1993 claiming general damages and emoluments due until the end of the contract. Clause 8 of the contract allowed either party to terminate by giving six months' written notice or paying six months' salary in lieu. No notice was given by the employer.
Issues
- Whether damages for breach of a fixed-term employment contract terminable on notice should be assessed on the notice period or the unexpired term of the contract.
- Whether the respondent was obliged to mitigate her loss by seeking alternative employment.
- Whether the general damages awarded were excessive.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Award made by the learned Principal Judge set aside.
- Substituted award of Shs.1,200,000 as salary and US$12,000 overseas allowance.
- Appellant to have the costs of the appeal and of the suit.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (6)
- Southern Highland Tobacco Union Limited v David McQueen (1960) EA 490
- Latchford Premier Cinema Limited v Ennion (1931) Ch 409
- Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd [1909] AC 488
- Flint v Lovell [1935] 1 KB 354
- RAMBHAI MALIJIBHAI PATEL - Civil Appeal No.20/42
- Echen (U) Ltd v Geraldine Namubiru & Josephine Namukasa (Civil Appeal No. 29 of 1994)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.