Kamya v Kampala District Land Board & Another (Civil Appeal 6 of 2013)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that judicial review concerns the decision-making process, not its correctness; mandamus cannot compel a public body's discretionary power, so the High Court's mandamus order was set aside.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Kamya applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.