Kamya Wavamuno v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 16 of 2000)
Treatment recorded in citing cases
followed in 3
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that an irregular committal does not nullify a trial absent prejudice, and unexplained recent possession of stolen dollars established the appellant as a thief.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Kamya Wavamuno applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.