Kaplan and Another v Leibbrandt and Another (Civil Case No. 82 of 1941 consolidated with Civil Case .No. 84' of 1941,)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
A solicitor trustee acting for himself and a co-trustee cannot charge profit costs for trust administration out of court absent an express power in the trust instrument. The will clause authorising the trustee to charge for acts which a trustee could have done personally was sufficiently wide to permit charges for non-professional work properly incurred, not merely professional costs. The matter was remitted to the Registrar for re-taxation on this basis.
Outcome
Matter remitted to Registrar for re-taxation having regard to the court's interpretation of the will clause
Facts
The executors and trustees of the estate of John Leibbrandt, deceased, included L. Kaplan, a solicitor. Two firms of advocates, Ralston & Kaplan and Kaplan & Stratton, filed bills of costs for work done in administering the estate. The Registrar disallowed certain items on the ground that they dealt with work between co-executors and because the will gave Mr. Kaplan a legacy of £100 for proving the will. The will contained a clause (Clause 5) stating that any trustee being a solicitor may charge professional or other charges for business done in connection with the trusts, including acts which a trustee could have done personally. The applicant firms sought to review the Registrar's decision.
Issues
- Whether a solicitor trustee can charge profit costs for administration of a trust estate out of court in the absence of a power to charge contained in the instrument creating the trust.
- Whether the clause in the testator's will authorised the solicitor trustee to charge for non-professional work which a trustee could have done personally.
Orders
- Matter referred back to the learned Registrar in respect of the disallowed items for re-taxation.
- Non-professional charges properly incurred may be allowed.
- Each party to have costs of application out of the estate.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
- Rules of Court (Rule 2 of 1916)
Cases cited (5)
- Lincoln v Windsor (68 ER 456)
- In re Fish, Bennett v Bennett [1893] 2 Ch 413
- Clarkson v Robinson [1900] 2 Ch 722
- Chalinder v Herington [1907] 1 Ch 58
- In re Chapple, Newton v Chapman (1884) 27 Ch D 584
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.