Kasto Budebo v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 22 93)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Murder conviction quashed where the sole eyewitness's account conflicted with the medical evidence; the appellant, having used excessive force repelling an intruder, was guilty only of manslaughter.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Kasto Budebo applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.