Katende v Victoria Nile Plastics (Miscellaneous Application 142 of 2023)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Court dismissed application to set aside ex-parte proceedings. Applicant arrived at court at 9:05 am but the suit was called at 9:06 am. Counsel claimed illness but provided no supporting evidence. Court found the conduct of both applicant and counsel dilatory and held that no sufficient cause was shown to warrant setting aside the ex-parte order under Order 9 rule 27 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Outcome
Application dismissed; underlying civil suit to proceed to judgment on ex-parte basis
Facts
The Respondent filed Civil Suit No. 004 of 2022 against the Applicant for recovery of UGX 70,320,000 being the balance on the value of goods taken. The Applicant filed a defence and counterclaim. The suit was set down for hearing on 19 September 2023 at 9:00 am by consent. On that date, neither the Applicant nor his advocate appeared in court. The Respondent was permitted to proceed ex-parte. The Applicant applied to set aside the ex-parte order, claiming he arrived at 9:05 am due to mechanical failure of his transport and that his advocate was sick. The court record showed the suit was called at 9:06 am. No medical evidence was provided to support counsel's illness claim.
Issues
- Whether there is sufficient cause shown by the Applicant to warrant setting aside the order to proceed ex-parte in Civil Suit No. 004 of 2022?
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Civil Suit No. 004 of 2022 set down for judgment.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (6)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Judicature Act s.33
- Civil Procedure Rules O.9 r.12
- Civil Procedure Rules O.9 r.27
- Civil Procedure Rules O.52 r.1
- Civil Procedure Rules O.52 r.2
Cases cited (1)
- Bishop Jacinto Kibuuka v The Uganda Catholic Lawyers Society and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 696 of 2018)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.