Wakilii

Kateregga Ronald v Kaweke James and Others (Miscellaneous Cause 180 of 2024)

High Court · [2025] UGHCLD 83 · 2025 Application Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for an order to deposit outstanding balance of purchase price in court
Decision
Application dismissed as time-barred

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

An application by a purchaser to deposit outstanding purchase price in court was dismissed as time-barred under the Limitation Act. The purchase agreement required payment within two weeks of 11 July 2018. Six years and eleven months had elapsed. Section 3(1)(a) of the Limitation Act bars actions on contract after six years from the date the cause of action arose.

Outcome

Application dismissed as time-barred

Facts

The applicant, Kateregga Ronald, purchased land comprised in Kyadondo Block 243 Plot 1661 at Luzira under a sale agreement dated 11 July 2018. He was registered on the Certificate of Title on 23 May 2022. The sale agreement required payment of the balance of UGX 100,000,000 within two weeks from execution, meaning by 15 July 2018. The applicant sought an order to deposit the outstanding balance of UGX 47,000,000 in court, claiming he could not locate the vendors. No reply was filed by the respondents. Neither the applicant nor his counsel appeared at the hearing. Six years and eleven months had elapsed since the payment deadline.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant could be granted an order to deposit the outstanding purchase price in court.
  2. Whether the application was barred by limitation.

Orders

  • Application dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.

Rules and key headnotes

Contract Law — Limitation of Actions — Actions on Contract — Six-Year Limitation Period
Under Section 3(1)(a) of the Limitation Act Cap 290, no action on contract shall be brought after six years from the date on which the cause of action arose.
Land & Property — Sale of Land — Payment of Purchase Price — Application to Deposit in Court — Time Bar
An application to deposit outstanding purchase price in court will be dismissed as time-barred where the contractual payment deadline has passed by more than six years and the limitation period for actions on contract has expired.

Legislation cited (1)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Kateregga_Ronald_v_Kaweke_James_and_Others_(Miscellaneous_Cause_180_of_2024)_[2025]_UGHCLD_83_(12_June_2025)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.